Why does SVE 's sub-title run so 'trippingly-not' off the tongue?
Moderns versus Post-Modernity indeed - why not moderns versus post-moderns or Modernity versus Post-Modernity ?
I constructed it that way because I have come to believe that while our world has decisively and permanently changed (ie is clearly post-modern in its structure) --- we haven't.
Or at least 80% of us haven't - a clear majority in anybody's books.
Our world has changed - bringing forth real biological and material restraints for us to butt our heads against.
However, inside those heads, inside our still-Modern heads, our wills have not changed or accepted those restraints as real.
We still expect "The Spirit of Scientism" to pull yet another rabbit out of the hat at the last minute to save our bacon.
(Quite a post-hegemonic mixing of metaphors there - no ?)
So what do we - the 20% - do about this crisis ?
We must strive to reconcile humanity to the fact that the physical world, outside their minds, has changed for good and that they must re-calibrate their dreams, hopes, illusions, delusions, to match......
Monday, June 25, 2012
SVE's "awkward" sub-title is no accident
Labels:
moderns,
post-modernity,
scientism
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Archive of older posts
Why My Urgency ?
- Michael Marshall
- Nova Scotia
- Histories of WWII all start with the presumption that it was a war raged between humans and human ideologies, with Nature’s climate and geography as side issues easily surmounted.My blog, on the contrary will only accept that it was conflict between humans and their ideology that STARTED the war but that it was the barriers thrown up by Mother Nature (geography & climate) that turned it into a war that lasted between 6 to 15 years and expanded to thoroughly involve all the world’s oceans and continents. High Modernity may have started the war convinced that Nature had been conquered and was about to be soon replaced by human Synthetic Autarky and that only human Tiger tanks and human Typhoon planes were to be feared. But by the end, more and more people had lost their naive faith in Scientism and were beginning to accept that humanity was thoroughly entangled with both the Nature of plants, animals & microbes as well as the Nature of so called “lesser” humanity. By 1965, the world was definitely entering the Age of Entanglement. Billions still believed - at least in part -with the promises of High Modernity but intellectually & emotionally, it was no longer dominant...
PEER REVIEW
The best form of 'peer review' is a diversity of comments from around the world - I welcome yours.
No comments:
Post a Comment