Saturday, July 14, 2012

1%'s newspapers leave century's biggest news story to the 99%'s blogosphere

And that is 100% alright by me !


No one ever went broke, underestimating the intelligence of a newspaper owner...


If the newspapers, owned by the same rich 1% whose other corporate investments are causing destructive climate change, choose to deliberate ignore the century's biggest news story, they will just dig their own graves a little faster than they already are.

In their place, the amateur blogosphere, owned by the 99% and sharing the concerns of the 99%, will have to cover the biggest scoop of the century, unimpeded by the pros of  Wapping et al.

How sweet is that ?!

With idiots like that for enemies, what blogger needs friends .....


No comments:

Post a Comment

Archive of older posts

Why My Urgency ?

My photo
Nova Scotia
Histories of WWII all start with the presumption that it was a war raged between humans and human ideologies, with Nature’s climate and geography as side issues easily surmounted.My blog, on the contrary will only accept that it was conflict between humans and their ideology that STARTED the war but that it was the barriers thrown up by Mother Nature (geography & climate) that turned it into a war that lasted between 6 to 15 years and expanded to thoroughly involve all the world’s oceans and continents. High Modernity may have started the war convinced that Nature had been conquered and was about to be soon replaced by human Synthetic Autarky and that only human Tiger tanks and human Typhoon planes were to be feared. But by the end, more and more people had lost their naive faith in Scientism and were beginning to accept that humanity was thoroughly entangled with both the Nature of plants, animals & microbes as well as the Nature of so called “lesser” humanity. By 1965, the world was definitely entering the Age of Entanglement. Billions still believed - at least in part -with the promises of High Modernity but intellectually & emotionally, it was no longer dominant...

PEER REVIEW

The best form of 'peer review' is a diversity of comments from around the world - I welcome yours.